Here’s a detailed review of the Simrad GO series chartplotter / fishfinder units (often sold as “GO Chartplotter and Fish Finder” combos) — what they do well, what limitations to watch out for, and how they might perform (especially in conditions like Bangladesh’s rivers/coasts).
Because “Simrad GO” comes in multiple screen sizes (GO5, GO7, GO9, GO12, etc.) and variants (XSE, XSR, etc.), some features differ by model. But many of the strengths and tradeoffs hold across the line.
What the Simrad GO Series Is (Overview & Key Features)
The Simrad GO line are multifunction displays (MFDs) that combine chartplotter (navigation) capabilities with sonar/fish-finding functions. Some key features common or available in many GO models:
| Feature | Description / Typical Spec |
|---|---|
| Touchscreen / hybrid interface | Most GO units use a multi-touch capacitive screen plus physical controls (some models) for adjusting menus, panning/zooming maps, etc. |
| Chart & map support | They support multiple chart providers, including C-MAP, Navionics, NV Digital, and integrate with map overlays, routing, etc. |
| Radar compatibility | Many GO units are “radar-ready” with plug-and-play support for Simrad HALO, broadband radar systems, enabling radar overlays on charts in poor visibility. |
| Sonar / imaging support | With appropriate transducers, GO units can deliver CHIRP sonar, structure / down imaging (StructureScan HD) and side imaging (on certain models). |
| Networking & integration | NMEA 2000 compatibility, WiFi for chart updates / connectivity, integration with other marine electronics (engine data, sensors) in many GO units. |
| Bright, sunlight-viewable displays | The GO units are built to be usable in bright daylight, with split-screen, customizable views, etc. |
| Ease of use / user interface | Simrad emphasizes intuitive operation, “smartphone-like” gestures for zoom/pan, and easy menu layouts. |
From actual product listings:
- One listing describes the GO9 XSE (as a GO series model) as “easy to navigate … premium display … radar ready … plug-and-play with Simrad HALO radar systems.”
- Users mention that navigation, switching between modes, creating routes etc. is fairly straightforward on GO units.
So, you get a capable chartplotter + fish finder combo, with flexibility to upgrade or expand systems (radar, sensors, etc.).
What Works Well / Pros
Here are the strengths and standout features of Simrad GO units, based on reviews, user reports, and feature sets.
- All-in-one functionality with upgrade paths
You don’t just get a fish finder — you also get charting, navigation, and the ability to integrate radar, sensors, engine data, etc. This makes the GO line more future-proof. - Strong chart & map options
Having support for multiple chart providers gives flexibility. You’re not locked into a single mapping ecosystem. (Many users prefer one chart brand over another.) - Radar support is a strong plus
For boats operating near coasts, in fog, islands, or heavy boat traffic, the ability to overlay radar on the navigation display is very valuable. - Good sonar / imaging capabilities
With the right transducer, GO units can produce clean sonar, side imaging, and down imaging. For many anglers, the combined sonar + structure imaging is a big step up vs basic depth finders. - User interface & display flexibility
The touchscreen with intuitive gestures, split-screens, customizable layouts, etc., make the device easier to use while underway. You can see charts + sonar side by side, or full screen whichever you want. - Strong daylight visibility
The displays are designed to maintain readability in sunlight, which is a must for marine electronics. - Good value in higher-end combinations
Many users feel you get advanced features (radar integration, imaging, charting) without paying only for ultra-premium brand names. For example, the GO9 XSE is frequently mentioned in “best budget MFDs / fish finders” lists.
Weaknesses, Trade-offs & Things to Watch Out For
No system is perfect. Here are limitations or issues that show up in user reports or by inference.
- Cost / price of full features
While base units are competitive, adding high-end transducers (structure scan / side imaging), radar, sensors, etc., can increase the total cost substantially. - Complexity & learning curve
Because GO units offer many features, some users find the learning curve is steeper than simpler fish finders. On Reddit, one user noted that Simrad units “are less intuitive” and sometimes require referring to manuals. - Touchscreens vs wet hands / rough seas
Touchscreens don’t always work well with gloves, wet fingers, spray, or in bouncy conditions. Some users prefer having physical buttons or knobs for critical adjustments - Reliability / firmware quirks
In marine electronics, firmware, data corruption, or startup issues sometimes occur. Some users report occasional “unit freezing” or slower GPS startup. (While I didn’t find many widespread complaints specifically for GO, this is a general risk in complex electronics.) - Performance limits in depth / bottom resolution
As with many MFDs, in very deep water, target separation becomes harder, bottom echo may dominate, and smaller fish may be harder to detect precisely, especially with lower-powered transducers. - Dependency on external hardware quality
The performance is heavily influenced by transducers, mounting, power supply, cabling, wiring, and placement. Even the best GO unit won’t perform well if the transducer is poorly installed or obstructed. - Integration / interoperability issues
Some users report that integration with other systems (especially third-party gear) can be finicky or require additional modules, cabling, or configuration. For example, networked electronics (NMEA 2000) sometimes require proper setup to be stable. One user commented that Simrad has “lower performance on screens (delays after touching)” and “less integration” compared to other brands. - Chart / map licensing / cost
Although GO supports many chart formats, premium chart subscriptions or upgrades may cost extra. Some users may find that in their region, the included charts are basic and they must purchase better local maps.
How It Performs (Real Use Observations)
Here are insights from actual user feedback and reviews about how Simrad GO units work in practice.
- The GO9 XSE is one of the commonly reviewed models. In reviews, users praised sharp sonar + imaging visuals, smooth interface, and good value.
- In Field & Stream’s “6 Best Fish Finders” list, the Simrad GO9 XSE was named “Best Budget” among MFD fish finders.
- Users note that GO units boot somewhat slower than simpler fish finders, but once running, the responsiveness is good.
- Some posts in forums caution that the GO series (especially smaller models) may struggle with “tracking bottom” at higher speeds (e.g. > 9 knots) with certain transducers. One West Marine review notes a customer complaint: “Cannot track bottom when going over 9 mph.”
- On Reddit, a user of the GO7 said: “I have a GO7 with the Navionics card … The GO series is great.”
Another user in a discussion: “Most plotters come with base maps… pay extra for detailed maps … your fishfinder no longer just shows depth, it becomes a navigation tool too.” - In a comparison thread between Simrad GO vs “Cruise” (another Simrad line), members mention that GO has better feature set (NMEA, charting etc.), while some had issues with slow GPS or occasional glitches.
So in real use, Simrad GO units generally deliver as promised — powerful, flexible, and capable — but demand proper setup, attention to hardware quality (transducer, wiring), and user familiarity.
How Well It Might Work in Bangladesh / Tropical / River / Coastal Conditions
Based on what I know of the GO series, here are how these units might fare (and tips) in contexts similar to Bangladesh (rivers, estuaries, tropical, silt, brackish water):
- Fresh / brackish water: The sonar and imaging should work fine, though high turbidity (murky, silty water) will reduce effective range and clarity of returns. You may need to adjust gain, frequency, and settings for local water clarity.
- Salinity & corrosion: Using electronics in saltwater or mix of salt + freshwater demands rigorous rinsing, corrosion protection (anti-corrosion sprays, sealing connectors), and maintenance of connectors, mounts, and transducers.
- Sediment / silt: Rivers often have suspended particles. These may cause “noise” in sonar returns. Careful tuning of sonar filters, noise rejection, and maybe limiting sensitivity is needed.
- Shallow waters / riverbeds: For many rivers or estuaries, depths are not extreme. GO units with CHIRP + imaging transducers can give good detail in shallow zones. But beware of bottom clutter (gas, debris) confusing the signals.
- Power / wiring: In remote regions, stable power supply is essential. Use good marine wires, fuse protection, stable voltage, surge protection.
- Local mapping charts: The availability of high-resolution / local charts/maps (bathymetry) may be limited in some regions. You might need to rely on generating your own depth maps (via mapping mode) or importing whatever local charts are available.
Verdict & Recommendation
The Simrad GO series is among the more capable, flexible chartplotter + fishfinder units suited for serious anglers or boaters who want room to grow. If you choose a model size that fits your boat (GO7, GO9, GO12, etc.), invest in a quality transducer and good wiring, and take care of it, it can be a long-lasting, high-performing system.
In terms of rating (for mid to upper midrange), I’d rate the GO series around 8.5 to 9 /10 when properly installed and used appropriately. The “missing” points are mostly due to complexity, cost of optional add-ons, and occasional interface quirks in challenging conditions.
